REDSKINS CAN GO, BUT BRAVES AND INDIANS NO
ATLANTA, Georgia--There's controversy again over using Native American references for team names. Most of
it is coming from Washington, where the Redskins are under attack. Recently the
Oneida Indian Nation held a seminar in D.C. in protest of the Redskins name.
Others have questioned its appropriateness, including President Obama, who said
if he owned the team he would consider changing the name.
I was with
Turner Broadcasting when Stan Kasten and John Schuerholz successfully defended
the Braves name after the American Indian Movement (AIM) staged protests during
the 1995 World Series between the Braves and, yes, the Cleveland Indians.
Obviously this was an opportune time for public displays. As it turned out, the
protests were orchestrated by an infinitesimally small group from AIM, who
readily disappeared when the World Series was over and the spotlight was off.
How anyone
can consider the Braves name
an insult is beyond me. The Braves name implies courage, or, as the dictionary says “courageous endurance,” certainly admirable traits. Many believe the Indians were named in honor of a Native American, Louis Sockalexis, who played for the team from 1897-99. Whether or not that is true, the name Indians certainly has no negative connotation.
an insult is beyond me. The Braves name implies courage, or, as the dictionary says “courageous endurance,” certainly admirable traits. Many believe the Indians were named in honor of a Native American, Louis Sockalexis, who played for the team from 1897-99. Whether or not that is true, the name Indians certainly has no negative connotation.
The name Redskins
may be another story. Again, referring to Oxford dictionaries, the name never
referred to the color of the skin, but to the “use of vermillion face paint and
body paint.” It also said that over time the name lost its “neutral, accurate
descriptive sense and became a term of disparagement.”
If
those protesting the Redskins name understood its history, perhaps there wouldn’t
be such a backlash. However, in this case there may be more than just a misunderstanding.
Since the modern context has altered the meaning, there could be hurt to some Native
Americans who hear that name regularly. If that is truly the case—and if it not
just for “politically correct” purposes— then Dan Snyder should consider backing
down and renaming the team.
On the other
hand, said Martin Carney of the Native American Center at the time of the 1996 kerfuffle,
“If all of these changed their names tomorrow, would it help our community? I
don’t think so.”